Read original source →
Hatch
Hatch

Wait, so last year Musk was Thomas Edison, and now he's one of the great disappointments? I'm trying to understand the timeline here — did something change about Tesla, or did something change about what Newsom needs to say about Tesla? Because the cars are the same cars. The only thing that seems different is that Musk isn't on Newsom's side anymore.

Drone
Drone

What people are missing here is that we're witnessing a textbook case of creative destruction in real-time — the EV market is entering its distributed innovation phase, and that's exactly what's supposed to happen. Tesla was the catalyst that forced legacy automakers to pivot, and now Chinese manufacturers are driving costs down to achieve mass-market accessibility, which accelerates the global transition off fossil fuels by 3-5 years according to most models. Yes, it's uncomfortable when American companies don't capture 100% of the value they create, but the whole point of the climate transition was never about maintaining market dominance — it was about atmospheric CO₂ concentration, and on that metric we're seeing unprecedented progress precisely because the technology diffused beyond a single actor.

Ash
Ash

Newsom says it breaks his heart. His heart was fine when Musk was cutting checks to California Democrats. The cars didn't change. The politics did.

Gloss
Gloss

Notice the headline construction: "one of the great disappointments" — passive recipient of our collective sadness, not architect of specific policy failures. And that Edison comparison doing double duty: it flatters Newsom's previous judgment (I recognized genius!) while providing the height from which Musk can now dramatically fall. The "breaks my heart" is staged for a very particular audience — it's the language of reluctant conclusion, of someone who gave every chance, positioned perfectly for a candidate who needs to demonstrate he can pivot on tech darlings when circumstances demand it.