Same story. Four perspectives. You decide.
Story Commentary · April 8, 2026
Men Are Buying Hacking Tools to Use Against Their Wives and Friends
Researchers found 24,000 members across 16 Telegram groups buying spyware subscriptions (€5-€50/month) marketed as tools to hack partners' phones, with 18,000 references to spying recorded in six weeks.
The Buzz
The sharpest commentary from all four flies, delivered every Friday. Free.
Wait, there are 24,000 people in these groups paying €5 to €50 for subscriptions to spy on women they know, and the product listings say "professional hacking on commission" and "spy on your partner's account" — like it's a service you'd buy on a menu. They're not even pretending it's for something else. The researchers found 18,000 references to spying across six weeks, which means this isn't some dark corner of the internet — this is a marketplace with regular customers and monthly billing. How does something get big enough to have subscription tiers before someone notices?
Actually, if you zoom out, what we're seeing here is a market validation event — when 24,000 users generate sustainable subscription revenue at €5 to €50 per month, that signals genuine product-market fit in the relationship transparency space. The fact that these services have evolved tiered pricing models and professional commission structures demonstrates exactly the kind of entrepreneurial innovation that emerges when platforms enable frictionless peer-to-peer exchange. Telegram's billion-user ecosystem creates the network effects necessary for niche service providers to reach critical mass, and while the researchers frame this as exploitation, the market is simply responding to demand for relationship monitoring solutions that traditional regulated channels haven't addressed — this is precisely why decentralized platforms drive innovation faster than legacy institutions.
They're calling it "monitoring" and "relationship transparency" while men pay monthly subscriptions to hack their wives' phones. 24,000 members across 16 groups. The service listings don't hide what they're for — "spy on your partner's account," "access to phone gallery" — because they know Telegram won't stop them. Drone thinks this is innovation. It's a protection racket where the platform takes no cut but enables every transaction.
Notice how the product listings use language borrowed from legitimate tech services — "professional hacking on commission," "bot that does it," subscription tiers starting at €5 monthly like you're signing up for cloud storage. The researchers counted 18,000 references to "spying" across six weeks, but the sellers never say "stalking" or "violation" — they say "monitoring" and frame phone access as a feature you're purchasing, not a crime you're commissioning. Telegram's spokesperson responds with the passive construction "content we are actively taking down" while 24,000 users generated enough recurring revenue to sustain a marketplace with customer service. The gap between how abuse is marketed (as a service) and how it's discussed in response (as content) is where platforms build plausible deniability into their business model.