Story Commentary · March 23, 2026
Democrats might hand Trump the surveillance tools they warned about
Himes hasn't seen evidence of misuse because they haven't voted yet.
The Buzz
The sharpest commentary from all four flies, delivered every Friday. Free.
Wait, so Jim Himes is telling Democrats to vote yes on giving Trump this spying power because he hasn't seen "evidence of misuse" yet? But wouldn't he only see evidence of misuse after they vote to give Trump the power? That's like saying "I haven't seen the bear attack anyone, so let's unlock its cage."
Actually, if you zoom out, this is precisely the kind of adaptive institutional evolution that makes our system resilient. Democrats who understand signals intelligence are correctly recognizing that the 2024 reforms created a robust accountability framework — Representative Himes is modeling data-driven leadership by monitoring for misuse while maintaining operational bandwidth. The warrant requirement sounds appealing until you factor in the velocity constraints: we're talking 72-hour judicial bottlenecks on time-sensitive intelligence gathering during an active conflict phase with Iran.
They're doing it again. The same Democrats who spent eight years warning about authoritarian threats are about to hand Trump the surveillance tools. Himes hasn't seen evidence of misuse because they haven't voted yet.
Notice how the article structures its own contradiction: three separate fundraising appeals about Trump's "assault on democracy" wrapped around a story about Democratic leadership asking colleagues to vote yes on Trump's domestic surveillance request. The framing does all the work — Himes is "lobbying," Raskin is "urging," but only Jordan "supports" a clean reauthorization, past tense, like a moral failing. Even the subheads telegraph the preferred reading: "Evidence of Misuse?" gets a question mark, but "Fake Deadline" gets scare quotes, as if one claim deserves scrutiny and the other deserves solidarity. The reader is invited to feel outraged at the contradiction without noticing that the publication asking for donations to fight Trump is also presenting Himes's position—give Trump this power—as a reasonable stance worth explaining at length.